The Basic Principles Of what is the purpose of case law

The Basic Principles Of what is the purpose of case law

Blog Article

“There is no ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any of your present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din noticed firstly the deceased and after some distance they saw the petitioners going towards the same direction, did not imply that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. This kind of evidence cannot be treated as evidence of last noticed.

In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative from the legislation laid down with the Supreme Court in the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. So, the competent authority in the parent department with the petitioner as well as Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount of the petitioner and pay back the pension amount and other ancillary benefits to the petitioner to which He's entitled under the law within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority of the respondent can also be directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits from the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more

V)      During investigation, the Investigating Officer concluded that hearth-arm injury which was fatal into the deceased was caused because of the petitioner but in support of opinion of the Investigating Officer no iota of evidence is accessible over the file and mere ipsi dixit of police will not be binding over the Court.

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-224033 Tag:Supplied the legal analysis on the subject issue, we're on the view that the claim in the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their initial contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle just isn't legally seem, Other than promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They can be issue to rules and regulations When the recruitment rules of the topic post allow the case of your petitioners for promotion could be thought of, however, we are clear in our point of view that contractual service cannot be deemed for seniority and promotion as being the seniority is reckoned from the date of standard appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Conditioning, issue to availability of vacancy subject matter to the approval from the competent authority.

Because of their position between the two main systems of legislation, these types of legal systems are sometimes referred to as blended systems of legislation.

In this blog post, we will delve into the details of Section 302 PPC, Checking out its provisions plus the gravity of its punishment.

لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................

This guide provides important insights into free online resources offering access to Pakistani case legislation, helping you navigate the complexities of legal research.

Civil Courts keep jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it calls for legal transfer case law on mutation of title. Agreement to sell must be generated and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more

This public interest litigation came before the Supreme Court of Pakistan when petitioners challenged the construction of a close-by electricity grid station resulting from probable health risks and dangers.

The appellate court determined that the trial court experienced not erred in its decision to allow more time for information for being gathered via the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.

She did note that the boy still needed in depth therapy in order to cope with his abusive past, and “to reach the point of being Harmless with other children.” The boy was acquiring counseling with a DCFS therapist. Again, the court approved in the actions.

Because of this, simply citing the case is more prone to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Think about it as calling anyone to tell them you’ve found their dropped phone, then telling them you live in these types of-and-such neighborhood, without actually providing them an address. Driving within the neighborhood seeking to find their phone is likely being more frustrating than it’s truly worth.

a hundred and fifteen . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi As far as the stance on the respondents that pensionary benefits can be withheld on account on the allegations leveled against the petitioner, inside our view, section 20 of the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does supply for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension might be withheld or reduced. These incorporate if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension may be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a significant crime, their pension may very well be withheld or reduced. In some cases, a civil servant's pension could possibly be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions established with the government.